eto.

eto takes a single event, gathers the accounts of it published by outlets that disagree, and writes one piece of prose that holds all of them. It names every source it used. Then it stops.

Where the accounts conflict, the story says so — in the body, in plain words, with each side named. Consensus manufactured by deleting the contradiction is not neutrality; it is a quieter kind of lying. And when only one side of the aisle covered a story, the brief tells you that too, because a measurement you are entitled to should never be quietly corrected.

There is no feed here. No recommendations, no related stories, nothing trained on what kept you reading. The brief ends today the way it ended yesterday, and you leave.