Trump Proposes AI Force and New Name for AI, While Tech Leaders Warn of Risks
President Donald Trump has proposed creating an "AI Force" modeled on the Space Force and plans to appoint an AI czar, according to multiple outlets. He also suggested alternative names for artificial intelligence, including "Superior Intelligence," "Extreme Intelligence," and "Supreme Intelligence," calling the current term "inaccurate" and "very ineloquent." Trump has consistently defended the AI industry, claiming that the only control needed is a "STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT," which he asserts the U.S. has in abundance.
The AI industry has faced growing concerns from major companies and experts, who have warned of the technology's potential risks. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and Elon Musk have all called for slowing AI development to ensure safety measures keep pace with advancements. Some lawmakers have also expressed concerns, with Republican senators like Josh Hawley and Jon Husted pushing for legislation to address data security and infrastructure costs related to AI.
Where the accounts differ
FOX News reports that the Defense Production Act (DPA) could be used to regulate AI if it poses a national security threat, and that Congress has extended most of the DPA's authorities through December 2026. This is not mentioned in the other accounts. The Hill notes that Trump posted a poll asking followers to vote on new names for AI, while Straight Arrow News adds that Trump also asked the public to weigh in on a new name for AI, suggesting "Superior Intelligence," "Extreme Intelligence," or "Supreme Intelligence." The Hill and Axios both mention Trump's proposal for an AI czar, but only Axios provides details about the lack of specifics on the role's responsibilities or budget.
Trump returns to White House as State Department issues security alerts for Middle East
President Trump cut his weekend trip to Camp David short a day early, returning to Washington, D.C., on Saturday evening. The White House pool report noted his arrival at the Ellipse just before 8 p.m. The return followed a new security alert issued by the State Department, which warned Americans in the Middle East to “exercise heightened vigilance” and prepare for potential travel disruptions due to attacks from the Iranian-backed Houthis on Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia confirmed that the Houthis attempted to attack its capital with a ballistic missile, according to The Associated Press. The Houthi military spokesperson, Brig. Gen. Yahya Saree, stated the group used “a large number of ballistic and cruise missiles” and drones to target Riyadh and Aramco facilities in Yanbu. This marks the first time the Houthis have targeted Riyadh since the conflict with Saudi Arabia intensified.
The White House revised Trump’s schedule to bring him back Saturday evening, with a press gathering set for 7 p.m. ET. The State Department issued identical warnings from U.S. diplomatic posts in Saudi Arabia and Jerusalem, advising travelers to sign up for the government’s traveler enrollment program and to remain cautious. The U.S. Mission in Iraq also issued a security alert, warning of hostilities against Saudi Arabia and advising travelers to brace for flight cancellations and airspace shutdowns.
Where the accounts differ
The Hill and The Daily Caller both report that Saudi Arabia confirmed the Houthis attempted to attack Riyadh with a ballistic missile, but The Daily Caller adds that the strike was intercepted and that some residents reported hearing a blast and seeing smoke near the airport. The Hill does not mention the interception or the smoke. The Washington Examiner describes smoke plumes over Riyadh’s airport and air raid alerts, but does not mention the missile attack. The Christian Science Monitor and NPR do not mention Trump’s return to Washington or the White House’s security alerts. Al Jazeera reports that Saudi authorities issued air raid alerts and that at least one explosion was heard in Riyadh, with smoke seen near the airport, but does not mention the missile attack.
Lone Holdout Juror in Lindsay Clancy Trial Retained Trump Lawyer, Ex-Husband to Appear on 60 Minutes
The lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial, Michael Desronvil, has retained attorney Edward Paltzik, who previously represented President Donald Trump in several high-profile lawsuits. Desronvil, who has remained largely silent since the mistrial, issued his first formal statement, rejecting claims he ignored the law. Clancy, who admitted to killing her children in January 2023, remains at a state hospital while prosecutors decide whether to retry her. Her ex-husband, Patrick Clancy, is set to speak publicly about the case in an upcoming 60 Minutes interview, where he will discuss his grief and the conspiracy theories surrounding the case.
Patrick Clancy, who testified during the trial, has faced online accusations of involvement in the killings despite no evidence supporting such claims. His attorney, Howard Cooper, has criticized the "relentless, escalating and destructive defamation campaign" against Clancy and her family. The trial ended in a mistrial after a 11-1 deadlock, with Desronvil believing Clancy planned the killings. Clancy’s defense argued she suffered from postpartum psychosis, a condition that can lead to severe mental health issues, including hallucinations and delusions.
Where the accounts differ
The Daily Wire reports that Paltzik represented Trump in lawsuits against The New York Times and CBS, resulting in settlements of $16 million and $15 million respectively. The Guardian and BBC do not mention these specific settlements, though they both note Paltzik’s involvement in the case. The New York Post and CBS News do not mention Paltzik’s past representation of Trump, instead focusing on Clancy’s legal team and the defamation claims against Patrick Clancy. The Guardian and BBC attribute the claim about the defamation campaign to Clancy’s attorney, Howard Cooper, while The Daily Wire and CBS News also attribute this to Cooper. The Daily Wire and BBC both mention Desronvil’s statement that he was “cut off” by other jurors, while The New York Post and CBS News do not include this detail.
Ed Sheeran Addresses Gaza Situation at Philadelphia Concert Amid Tour Controversy
Ed Sheeran opened his solo concert in Philadelphia on Saturday with comments about the situation in Gaza, calling it "catastrophic and unjustifiable." He said he wants his music and shows to be about unity and humanity, not politics, but acknowledged the humanitarian issue. Sheeran addressed the controversy that unfolded after his supporting acts withdrew in solidarity with opener Macklemore, who was dropped from the tour after making pro-Palestinian comments onstage. The rapper had said "Free Palestine" during a Sept. 5 show in New Jersey and performed a song critical of Israel's military actions in Gaza following the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attacks. The controversy led to the removal of Macklemore from the tour, with venues like Gillette Stadium refusing to host the show due to his comments. Sheeran denied being responsible for the decision, blaming the tour promoter and venue owners. His supporting acts, including Finneas and Lukas Graham, withdrew in solidarity with Macklemore, leaving Sheeran to perform solo. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators gathered outside the stadium, some expressing disappointment that Sheeran did not take a stronger stance.
Where the accounts differ
The Daily Wire reports that celebrities have "memory-holed" the October 7 attacks and now prioritize the Palestinian cause, while BBC and CBS News focus on the specific controversy involving Ed Sheeran and Macklemore. The Daily Wire attributes the shift in celebrity focus to a desire for "publicity and praise" and frames the Palestinian cause as a new "cause célèbre" akin to past issues like climate change or Trump-Russia collusion. BBC and CBS News provide more specific details about the removal of Macklemore from the tour, citing Robert Kraft's involvement and the financial donations pledged by both Macklemore and Sheeran. Al Jazeera and NPR also mention the protests and the public reactions of fans, but do not elaborate on the broader celebrity culture critique present in The Daily Wire. The Daily Wire also mentions the Venice Film Festival and the film "NAZA" receiving a standing ovation, which other accounts do not include.
Ukraine launches over 1,000 drones at Russia, including hundreds targeting Moscow
Ukrainian forces launched more than 1,000 drones at Russia overnight, with hundreds directed at Moscow, according to officials. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin described the attack as "unprecedented," claiming 450 drones were shot down en route to the capital. The strikes damaged a major oil refinery and a residential building, with two people killed. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy praised the strikes, calling them a significant blow to Russia’s war economy. Separately, Russian authorities reported a drone attack on a civilian bus in the Kherson region, killing two people, including an election official.
In the Kyiv region, at least four people were killed in Russian attacks, including three children, according to Ukrainian officials. The attacks come as Russia and Ukraine continue to escalate long-range strikes against each other, with both sides targeting energy infrastructure and logistics hubs to disrupt the other’s war effort.
Where the accounts differ
Al Jazeera and ABC News both report that a 44-year-old woman and an elderly man were killed in separate attacks, while NPR and Newsweek attribute the deaths to a 44-year-old woman and an elderly man in the Orekhovo-Zuevo district and Sofyino, respectively. BBC and Newsweek mention a 44-year-old woman killed in Sofyino, while Al Jazeera and ABC News report the same incident. NPR states that two people were killed in the Moscow region, while BBC and Newsweek report one person killed in Sofyino and another in Orekhovo-Zuevo. ABC News and Al Jazeera mention a fire at a 21-storey building that evacuated 400 people, while BBC and Newsweek report a fire at a three-storey building and a warehouse, respectively. NPR and Newsweek report that 138 Russian drones were launched, while Al Jazeera and ABC News report 1,600 Ukrainian drones intercepted, with 450 heading for Moscow.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs executive order on AI safety and kill switch
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order Friday aimed at enhancing AI oversight and potentially requiring a "kill switch" for advanced AI systems. The order focuses on independent audits and kill switches, addressing the lack of federal action on AI regulation. Newsom criticized the Trump administration for its inaction, stating that the federal government has failed to protect Americans from AI risks. The order accelerates the implementation of two recently passed California laws that establish frameworks for independent AI safety assessments. Newsom also mentioned convening a panel of experts to explore the concept of a kill switch further. Other Democratic presidential contenders, including Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and former Vice President Kamala Harris, have also expressed concerns about AI safety and called for regulatory measures. The order follows prior actions by Newsom to regulate AI and social media, including the signing of technology-related bills in September 2026.
Where the accounts differ
Axios reports that Newsom's executive order targets independent auditors and kill switches, and that it aligns with the positions of AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. It also notes that former Vice President Harris and Illinois Gov. Pritzker have also called for AI safety measures. Fox Business highlights Newsom's criticism of Trump and mentions the blocking of a federal AI kill switch bill by Sen. Rand Paul. It also notes that Trump has opposed new AI regulations and that AI executives have called for federal limits. The New York Post emphasizes the involvement of experts like Fei-Fei Li and mentions the veto of Senate Bill 1047 in 2024, which sought to add safety and liability requirements to AI firms. It also references Jacob Coxon's warnings about AI's potential to wipe out civilization.
DOJ won't enforce handgun ban for 18- to 20-year-olds
The Justice Department announced it will not criminally enforce a 1968 federal law that prohibits licensed gun dealers from selling handguns to individuals aged 18 to 20. Assistant Attorney General T. Elliot Gaiser stated the law violates the Second Amendment. The decision means federal prosecutors will not pursue criminal charges against dealers who sell handguns to law-abiding 18- to 20-year-olds. The law remains on the books but is not being enforced. The DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel concluded the restriction is unconstitutional, though it did not address whether agencies like the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) can continue administrative enforcement. The Supreme Court has not ruled on the constitutionality of the law, and federal appellate courts remain split on the issue.
Where the accounts differ
Axios and The Federalist both state the DOJ will not enforce the law, but Axios notes the opinion does not affect state laws, while The Federalist does not mention this. CBS News and New York Post both mention the DOJ will not appeal a court decision on silencers, which Axios and Straight Arrow News do not. Straight Arrow News and CBS News attribute the statement about 18-year-olds being "mature enough to be drafted, vote, serve as a juror, and be sentenced to death" to Assistant Attorney General Gaiser, while Axios and The Federalist do not. Axios and The Federalist both mention the 5th Circuit's 2012 ruling, while CBS News and New York Post do not. Straight Arrow News and CBS News attribute the claim that 18- to 20-year-olds are responsible for a disproportionate share of gun violence to GIFFORDS, while Axios and The Federalist do not.
Below the fold
One nomination from outside the front page. The model's printed reason — judge it:
37 people died in a Nigerian prison cell due to unsafe conditions, causing panic and health crises for survivors.
Dozens of suspected illegal miners die in Nigerian custody
Thirty-seven people accused of illegal mining in north-central Nigeria died in custody, according to officials. The Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), a paramilitary group working with police, initially blamed the deaths on a disease outbreak. However, an intelligence report shared with AFP suggested overcrowding and poor ventilation in the detention facility were responsible. The deaths sparked protests and a 24-hour curfew in Minna, the capital of Niger state.
Survivors described being locked in a cell with no ventilation, struggling to breathe, and appealing for help. A survivor, Dauda Shehu, told journalists at a hospital that detainees were "jam-packed" and "scampering for where to get fresh air." A video showed bodies of young men, many appearing to be teenagers, lying on the ground. Volunteers and veiled women identified the bodies, while voices shouted curses on those responsible. A survivor, who asked not to be named, said he survived because he was near the cell’s entrance where he could breathe better.
Protests broke out on Thursday evening in Minna, with some protesters armed with sticks, machetes, and traditional hunting rifles. Security forces used tear gas and live rounds to disperse the crowd. At least one body was found on the streets. The NSCDC said the detainees were held during raids on suspected illegal mines on 15 and 16 September in the Wushishi-Lukoto area. The state governor, Umar Bago, stated many of the dead were children aged 14 to 18 who had been working in the mines instead of going to school.
Where the accounts differ
The Guardian reports that the NSCDC initially blamed the deaths on a disease outbreak but later an intelligence report suggested overcrowding and inadequate ventilation were responsible. The BBC states the NSCDC initially blamed a disease outbreak but later said the cause was yet to be established. The Guardian mentions that the state governor, Umar Bago, said many of the dead were children aged 14 to 18, while the BBC refers to the state governor as Mohammed Umaru Bago. The Guardian includes a survivor’s account of being near the cell’s entrance and surviving, while the BBC includes a relative’s account of his son surviving because he was near a small window. The Guardian also describes a video showing bodies of young men and volunteers identifying them, which the BBC does not mention.